Jeff Hawkins on Artificial Intelligence – Part 5/5
The originator of Palm, Jeff Hawkins, solves the perplexity of Artificial Intelligence and presents his theory at the RSA Conference 2008. He gives a short tutorial on the cortex and then explains how the mentality stores module and then describes how to ingest that noesis to create staged intelligence. This reproval is insightful and his theory module indoctrinate machine science.
Related Posts
Comments
Comment from AgentGhost
Time October 8, 2011 at 9:42 am
@r0b0tj0n3s
Wow that’s impressive, especially considering the range.
Comment from crestonisme
Time October 8, 2011 at 10:28 am
@r0b0tj0n3s been looking into it lately…amazing stuff… instantaneous processing…coding on a quantum level…utilizing what mother nature has had all along…i’m a little lost when helium comes into the picture…not sure I follow that. Self aware AI would surely follow soon after (??)…we need to start asking the hard questions about AI now…and I still say slow to develop only with an * …once the foundation is set -the way technology grows exponentially- its off like a rocket.
Comment from r0b0tj0n3s
Time October 8, 2011 at 11:19 am
@crestonisme development of quantum computers is expected to begin within the next 20 years or so
Comment from r0b0tj0n3s
Time October 8, 2011 at 11:31 am
@notbored12 brazilian police force has implimented face recognition software in their helmets that can distinguish a face based on 46000 features. they’re on poortable helmets and could accurately pick you out of a crowd of thousands up to a 12 mile radius
Comment from cyuczieekc
Time October 8, 2011 at 11:51 am
heck yeah!
Comment from daviddalbylive
Time October 8, 2011 at 12:29 pm
Laughter is a disconnect between 2 different pictures of the world … the brain predicts an outcome and the punch line is different enough to make the brain laugh … thanks good lecture.
Comment from OriginalTharios
Time October 8, 2011 at 12:43 pm
@crestonisme Well, our greatest risk right now is the eventual depletion of carbon-based fuels. It’s not just an energy concern, but a synthetic production concern. Nearly all synthetics such as plastics are petroleum-derived. No petroleum, no plastics of any kind, and thus no sterile medical containers, and most medications would become unobtainable. Recycling would become our only option, and most synthetics are still not recyclable, to say nothing of digging up all the stuff in landfills.
Comment from crestonisme
Time October 8, 2011 at 1:35 pm
@OriginalTharios It is seemingly off topic but to me completely related…when I give thought to this matter one of the first things that comes to mind for me is the impending energy crisis. To me, there will either be literal lack of resources to further any progress in this area, or more likely this sort of technology would be hindered simply by not being the primary focus of the worlds technology…curious as to your thoughts regarding this.
Comment from OriginalTharios
Time October 8, 2011 at 2:07 pm
@crestonisme Technically, it requires three things…that we develop processors of sufficient capacity to fully support human-order HTMs at least in part ( like visual-only, or some other single-input type)…and after that, we develop a better understanding of the functional nature of HTMs…and finally that we learn to actually educate them, rather than try to cram discordant and contextless information into them as we do with our children today. How long it takes depends on those 3 things.
Comment from crestonisme
Time October 8, 2011 at 2:19 pm
@notbored12 could just be me….but it seems like this sort of technology will be very slow to develop….especially to the point of applying to and using it in our society.
Comment from SBarham102
Time October 8, 2011 at 2:22 pm
Do we have a current demo of this, I see there was one posted but it isnt availalbe anymore
Comment from caveatemp
Time October 8, 2011 at 2:39 pm
Hierarchy implies levels of importance, kings and serfs. I would argue that it’s holographic. Anywhere you cut through the pie you’ll get the same fruit. Seeming levels of importance are only levels of focus. We live in 4 dimensions- three of space that are nested in a “spiritual” dimension of time. To understand AI we must first get all knowledge of space-time and then know how it is nested in the 5th “spiritual” dimension.
Comment from gabydewilde
Time October 8, 2011 at 3:03 pm
@notbored12 elections, product placement and desktop dancers.
Comment from x1plus1x
Time October 8, 2011 at 3:15 pm
I found it very interesting when he mentioned the assumption that the HTMs need to make in order to work, and that is that the world is hierarchical in nature.
For a long time I have noticed this.. The Galaxy, The solar system, veins, arteries, rivers, streams, trees, outlines in school, Folders within folders on computers, etc, etc. It is a very elegant structure, and I feel it is related to the golden ratio.. 1:1.618
Comment from SpeedfreakUK
Time October 8, 2011 at 3:30 pm
@notbored12
The new video game control system for the Xbox 360, Kinect, which uses a camera to recognise human shapes and the position of their limbs and uses it as input instead of buttons on a controller, most likely uses this technology. I believe that’s what he was talking about when he mentioned the games industry was interested in this.
Comment from UnowMe00
Time October 8, 2011 at 4:27 pm
@pebre79 those are both video-based apps. Reflecting that the evolution of the artificial cognition project traversed projects handling visual data for training, evaluation and evolution. The evolution speed of such technology is still limited by the playground / assets of it’s human implementers. I attempt to change that in the next year.
Comment from UnowMe00
Time October 8, 2011 at 5:01 pm
@pebre79 those are both video-based apps. Reflecting, that the evolution of the artificial cognition project traversed projects handling visual data for training, evaluation and evolution. The evolution speed of such technology is still limited by the playground / assets of it’s human implementers. I attempt to change that in the next year.
Comment from UnowMe00
Time October 8, 2011 at 5:14 pm
@Remindor give me three years, I work on something that just might allow us to play with such stuff with ease
Comment from UnowMe00
Time October 8, 2011 at 5:37 pm
@notbored12 teh AI became that smart that fast, it managed to convince them to keep it secret! Again!
Comment from erionmema1
Time October 8, 2011 at 6:36 pm
this guy is full of shit!!!
Comment from eyhexs
Time October 8, 2011 at 6:54 pm
apply it to medical research; asap
Comment from BggProductions
Time October 8, 2011 at 7:39 pm
Very interesting, thanks for uploading.
Comment from pebre79
Time October 8, 2011 at 8:38 pm
@notbored12 and here: vitamin d inc dot com
Comment from pebre79
Time October 8, 2011 at 9:33 pm
@notbored12 you can check out people recognizer software here: numenta.com/about-numenta/demoapps.php
Comment from dojohansen123
Time October 8, 2011 at 9:28 am
“If someone wants to try to bulid, you know, robot buddies or something, they can do that. But that’s not what we’re about.”
I think this is brushing aside the issue a little too easily. The point is that this might *enable* such machines.
Don’t get me wrong, I am very excited about the whole thing. If this goes the way Jeff makes it look like it will, it’ll be at least as transformative as computing. I just think debate and awereness is necessary to protect the public interest.